[ad_1]
Support trulyindependent journalism
Find out moreClose
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Donald Trump is seeking to have the sentencing in his hush money trial delayed until after the election in November.
The former president’s attorneys argue in a letter that the current sentencing being scheduled for September 18 progresses prosecutors’ “election-interference objectives.”
The sentencing was originally set for July 11 but Judge Juan Merchan initially delayed it after the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity. Merchan said he would issue a ruling on the immunity claim two days before the September sentencing.
Trump’s legal team wrote in a letter sent to Merchan on Thursday that the “timing illustrates just how unreasonable it is to have the potential for only a single day between a decision on first-impression Presidential immunity issues and an unprecedented and unwarranted sentencing.”
The former president’s lawyers noted that the sentencing is currently set to begin after the start of early voting, arguing that delaying the sentencing until after the election would clear up “issues regarding the integrity of any future proceedings.”
“Finally, setting aside naked election-interference objectives, there is no valid countervailing reason for the Court to keep the current sentencing date on the calendar,” Todd Blanche and Emil Bove wrote. “There is no basis for continuing to rush. Accordingly, we respectfully request that any sentencing, if one is needed, be adjourned until after the Presidential election.”
The request to delay sentencing comes just a day after the Trump team failed to kick Merchan off the case for a third time.
Merchan rejected the recusal motion in a late filing on Tuesday. The Trump legal team has argued that there’s a conflict of interest as Merchan’s daughter is a political consultant working for Democrats.
Despite the repeated rejections of those motions, Trump attorneys wrote in the Thursday letter that a delay in the sentencing would “mitigate the asserted conflicts and appearances of impropriety.”
In May, Trump was convicted on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in relation to a hush money payment to adult actor Stormy Daniels shortly before the 2016 election.
Trump lawyers have accused Merchan’s daughter of having a “long-standing relationship” with Vice President Kamala Harris, arguing that she has “obtained — and stands to obtain in the future — extensive financial, professional, and personal benefits from her relationship with Harris.”
New York’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics found last year that Merchan’s impartiality couldn’t “reasonably be questioned” because of his daughter’s career.
“This Court now reiterates for the third time that which should already be clear,” Merchan said in his response. “Innuendo and mischaracterizations do not a conflict create. Recusal is therefore not necessary, much less required.”
The judge added that the former president has “provided nothing new for this Court to consider,” adding that his lawyers have simply “repeated arguments that have already been denied by this and higher courts.”
“Defense Counsel’s reliance, and apparent citation to his own prior affirmation, rife with inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims, is unavailing,” he added.
More follows…
[ad_2]
Source link
